/*
* Styling for the policy pages (terms, privacy, refund, contact, pricing).
*
* Self-contained on purpose. These pages load no Tailwind, no GSAP and no
* third-party CSS, for three reasons: a payment provider's compliance reviewer
* should never see a broken layout because a CDN was slow; they are the pages
* most likely to be read on a bad connection; and they are the easiest part of
* the site to serve under a strict CSP when the Tailwind CDN eventually goes.
*
* Colours mirror the app's dark theme (see style.css) so they do not read as a
* different website, but they are literal values rather than var() references
* because style.css is not loaded here.
*/
:root {
--bg: #050505;
--panel: #0a0a0c;
--primary: #8b5cf6;
--text: #e7e5e4;
--muted: #a1a1aa;
--border: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08);
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
body {
margin: 0;
background: var(--bg);
color: var(--text);
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.7;
-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased;
}
.wrap { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 40px 24px 96px; }
header.site {
border-bottom: 1px solid var(--border);
padding: 20px 24px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: space-between;
gap: 16px;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
/*
* The mark rides in as a BACKGROUND on the anchor plus left padding, not as a
* flex child. It is drawn here rather than in the markup because this rule is
* the single place six pages get their header from -- contact, pricing, privacy,
* refund, terms and venues -- and six identical hand-edits is six chances for
* one to drift.
*
* DO NOT MAKE THIS `display: inline-flex` WITH A `gap`. That was the first
* attempt and it broke the wordmark: the markup is `EliteQR`, so
* flex promotes the bare text node "Elite" and the span "QR" to two flex items
* and the gap opens BETWEEN THEM. The header silently started reading
* "Elite QR" instead of "EliteQR" -- caught in a screenshot, not by any test,
* because nothing about it errors.
*
* FIXED px, not em: the mark is drawn on a 64px grid with 6px modules, so at a
* size derived from the font it lands on fractional pixels and the ring holes
* blur. 22px against an 18px wordmark is the ratio the preview was tuned at.
* padding-left is that 22 plus a 9px gap.
*
* A background-image is governed by img-src, which is 'self', so this needs no
* CSP change. scan.html and hub.html carry their own .brand and are deliberately
* NOT included: they are the printed-code redirect path and do not take a new
* request for decoration.
*/
header.site a.brand {
font-weight: 800;
font-size: 18px;
letter-spacing: -0.02em;
color: var(--text);
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
padding-left: 31px;
line-height: 22px;
background: url("/assets/mark.svg") left center / 22px 22px no-repeat;
}
header.site a.brand span { color: var(--primary); }
header.site nav { display: flex; gap: 18px; flex-wrap: wrap; }
header.site nav a {
color: var(--muted);
text-decoration: none;
font-size: 13px;
}
header.site nav a:hover { color: var(--primary); }
h1 {
font-size: clamp(28px, 5vw, 40px);
line-height: 1.15;
letter-spacing: -0.03em;
margin: 24px 0 8px;
}
h2 {
font-size: 19px;
margin: 40px 0 12px;
letter-spacing: -0.01em;
border-left: 3px solid var(--primary);
padding-left: 12px;
}
h3 { font-size: 15px; margin: 24px 0 8px; color: var(--text); }
p, li { color: var(--muted); font-size: 15px; }
ul, ol { padding-left: 22px; }
li { margin-bottom: 8px; }
a { color: var(--primary); }
.updated {
font-size: 13px;
color: var(--muted);
margin-bottom: 32px;
padding-bottom: 24px;
border-bottom: 1px solid var(--border);
}
/*
* Placeholders the operator must replace before publishing. Deliberately loud:
* a policy page that ships with "[COMPANY NAME]" still in it is worse than no
* policy page, and this makes that impossible to miss on a skim.
*/
.todo {
background: rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12);
border: 1px solid rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.4);
color: #fde047;
padding: 2px 8px;
border-radius: 6px;
font-weight: 700;
font-size: 13px;
white-space: nowrap;
}
.note {
background: var(--panel);
border: 1px solid var(--border);
border-radius: 12px;
padding: 16px 20px;
margin: 24px 0;
}
.note p:first-child { margin-top: 0; }
.note p:last-child { margin-bottom: 0; }
table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 20px 0; font-size: 14px; }
th, td { text-align: left; padding: 12px; border-bottom: 1px solid var(--border); vertical-align: top; }
th { color: var(--text); font-weight: 600; }
td { color: var(--muted); }
.table-scroll { overflow-x: auto; }
footer.site {
border-top: 1px solid var(--border);
padding: 32px 24px;
text-align: center;
color: var(--muted);
font-size: 13px;
}
footer.site a { margin: 0 10px; }
/* ==========================================
PRICING
==========================================
THE ONE IDEA, carried over from the landing page: a plan card is a QR code.
Faint module grid, a real finder pattern on the featured plan instead of a
floating "BEST VALUE" pill, and a scan line that sweeps the card on hover.
The rationale for each of those is written out at the PRICING block in
style.css -- this is the same design, rebuilt for a page that loads no
Tailwind, no GSAP and no JavaScript at all.
WHY REBUILT RATHER THAN SHARED. The landing's cards are assembled in
js/pricing-ui.js out of Tailwind utility classes over the hand-written
.plan-card rules. Reusing that markup here would mean putting the Tailwind
Play CDN on the one public page a payment reviewer is most likely to read and
Google is most likely to rank -- a ~400KB JIT compiler, a third-party CDN in
the layout's critical path, and a fourth page pinned to 'unsafe-eval'. The
decorative layers themselves were always plain CSS, so only the layout had to
be rewritten.
THE DIFFERENCES FROM THE LANDING, all forced by having no JS:
- The glow is a static top-centre radial that fades in on hover, not a
pointer-tracked spotlight. js/motion.js sets --mx/--my there; nothing
sets them here, and the fallback values put the light in a sensible place.
- No GSAP tilt, so no perspective wrapper.
- The scan sweep is a CSS keyframe on :hover rather than a timeline. It is
the signature of the section and it survives the port intact.
The global prefers-reduced-motion rule at the end of this file kills all of it.
COLOURS. style.css draws from theme tokens because --primary is user-swappable
and one theme is light. This page has no theme switcher and is always dark, so
the :root block at the top of this file is the whole palette.
*/
/* Pricing needs more room than 800px of prose. Applied alongside .wrap. */
.wrap.wide { max-width: 1080px; }
/*
* FREE, as a full-width band rather than a fourth card.
*
* It is not competing on price with the paid plans -- it is the state every
* account already starts in -- and standing it in the grid made four cards where
* the landing deliberately tuned three. A band also gives the allowance list room
* to run in two columns instead of a narrow stack.
*/
.plan-free {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: minmax(200px, 260px) 1fr;
gap: 28px;
align-items: start;
background: var(--panel);
border: 1px solid var(--border);
border-radius: 20px;
padding: 28px;
margin: 28px 0 20px;
}
.plan-free h3 { margin: 0 0 6px; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.1em; font-size: 12px; color: var(--primary); }
.plan-free .price { font-size: 40px; font-weight: 800; color: var(--text); letter-spacing: -0.03em; line-height: 1; }
.plan-free .plan-note { font-size: 13px; margin: 10px 0 0; }
.plan-free ul { columns: 2; column-gap: 28px; margin: 0; }
@media (max-width: 640px) {
.plan-free { grid-template-columns: 1fr; gap: 18px; padding: 22px; }
.plan-free ul { columns: 1; }
}
/* The three subscriptions. minmax(0,1fr) rather than auto so a long feature
line cannot widen one column and unbalance the row. */
.plan-grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
gap: 18px;
margin: 20px 0 28px;
}
@media (max-width: 900px) { .plan-grid { grid-template-columns: 1fr; } }
.plan-card {
position: relative;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
padding: 26px;
border-radius: 22px;
border: 1px solid var(--border);
background: var(--panel);
overflow: hidden;
transition: border-color 0.35s ease, box-shadow 0.35s ease;
}
.plan-card:hover { border-color: color-mix(in srgb, var(--primary) 45%, transparent); }
@supports not (color: color-mix(in srgb, red 50%, transparent)) {
.plan-card:hover { border-color: var(--primary); }
}
.plan-card.is-featured {
border-color: var(--primary);
box-shadow: 0 18px 50px -24px var(--primary);
}
/* --- The module field: a QR symbol's grid, at the threshold of visible --- */
.plan-card__field {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
background-image:
linear-gradient(var(--primary) 1px, transparent 1px),
linear-gradient(90deg, var(--primary) 1px, transparent 1px);
background-size: 13px 13px;
opacity: 0.05;
/* Fades downward so the grid frames the price and never competes with the
button, which is the one thing on the card that must stay legible. */
-webkit-mask-image: linear-gradient(to bottom, #000 0%, transparent 62%);
mask-image: linear-gradient(to bottom, #000 0%, transparent 62%);
}
.plan-card.is-featured .plan-card__field { opacity: 0.11; }
/* --- Static glow. The landing tracks the pointer; this page has no JS. --- */
.plan-card__glow {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
opacity: 0;
transition: opacity 0.4s ease;
background: radial-gradient(320px circle at 50% 0%, var(--primary), transparent 68%);
mix-blend-mode: screen;
}
.plan-card:hover .plan-card__glow { opacity: 0.14; }
/* --- THE SIGNATURE: a scanner reading the card --- */
.plan-card__scan {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
height: 130px;
top: -130px;
pointer-events: none;
opacity: 0;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, transparent, var(--primary), transparent);
}
.plan-card:hover .plan-card__scan { animation: planScan 1.1s ease-in-out; }
@keyframes planScan {
0% { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(0); }
12% { opacity: 0.5; }
88% { opacity: 0.5; }
/* 130px of card + 130px of its own height clears the tallest card fully. */
100% { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(560px); }
}
.plan-card__body {
position: relative; /* above the field, the glow and the scan line */
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex: 1;
}
.plan-card__head {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: space-between;
gap: 12px;
min-height: 20px;
margin-bottom: 16px;
}
.plan-card__head h3 {
margin: 0;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 0.12em;
font-size: 10px;
font-weight: 700;
color: var(--muted);
}
.plan-card__best {
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 8px;
font-size: 9px;
font-weight: 700;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 0.14em;
color: var(--primary);
}
/* --- The finder pattern, drawn rather than imaged --- */
.qr-finder {
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
flex-shrink: 0;
border: 2.5px solid var(--primary);
border-radius: 5px;
position: relative;
}
.qr-finder::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
inset: 3.5px;
border-radius: 2px;
background: var(--primary);
}
/* Prices line up across cards; ₹89 and ₹649 share a rhythm. */
.plan-price {
display: flex;
align-items: baseline;
gap: 6px;
font-size: 40px;
font-weight: 800;
color: var(--text);
letter-spacing: -0.03em;
font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;
line-height: 1.05;
}
.plan-price .per { font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500; color: var(--muted); letter-spacing: 0; }
.plan-rate { font-size: 12px; margin: 6px 0 0; }
/* The launch-price line. Stated as a rise, never as a struck-through "was"
price -- see the comment block at the top of pricing.html. */
.plan-launch {
margin: 4px 0 0;
font-size: 11px;
font-weight: 600;
color: var(--primary);
}
/*
* The savings slot is ALWAYS rendered, on every card -- same reasoning as
* js/pricing-ui.js. A badge on two cards and nothing on the third gave the row
* three different internal rhythms and left a hole where the neighbours had a
* chip. Monthly states the rate the others are measured against.
*/
.plan-slot { display: flex; align-items: center; min-height: 30px; margin: 18px 0 20px; }
.plan-badge {
display: inline-block;
padding: 4px 9px;
border-radius: 6px;
background: rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.15);
color: #4ade80;
font-size: 10px;
font-weight: 700;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 0.12em;
}
.plan-badge.is-muted { background: none; color: #71717a; padding-left: 0; }
.plan-card ul, .plan-free ul, .plan-pass-note ul { list-style: none; padding: 0; }
.plan-card li, .plan-free li {
padding-left: 20px;
position: relative;
font-size: 13.5px;
margin-bottom: 7px;
break-inside: avoid;
}
.plan-card li::before, .plan-free li::before {
content: "→";
position: absolute;
left: 0;
color: var(--primary);
}
/* mt:auto pins the CTA to the card's foot so three cards of different feature
counts still share one button baseline. */
.plan-cta {
display: block;
margin-top: auto;
padding: 12px 16px;
border-radius: 12px;
border: 1px solid var(--border);
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
color: var(--text);
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
font-size: 12px;
font-weight: 700;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 0.1em;
transition: background 0.25s ease, opacity 0.25s ease;
}
.plan-cta:hover { background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1); }
.plan-cta.is-primary {
background: var(--primary);
border-color: transparent;
color: #fff;
}
.plan-cta.is-primary:hover { opacity: 0.9; background: var(--primary); }
/*
* The passes -- wide and low, so they cannot compete with the subscriptions.
* Somebody buying a code for Saturday's wedding is not choosing between ₹19 and
* ₹649; they already know which one they want.
*/
.plan-passes { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr)); gap: 14px; margin: 18px 0 28px; }
@media (max-width: 640px) { .plan-passes { grid-template-columns: 1fr; } }
.plan-pass {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: space-between;
gap: 16px;
padding: 15px 18px;
border-radius: 14px;
border: 1px solid var(--border);
background: var(--panel);
transition: border-color 0.3s ease, background 0.3s ease;
}
.plan-pass:hover { border-color: color-mix(in srgb, var(--primary) 45%, var(--border)); }
.plan-pass .plan-price { font-size: 22px; }
.plan-pass .plan-rate { margin-top: 2px; }
.plan-pass .plan-launch { margin-top: 2px; }
.plan-pass .plan-cta {
margin-top: 0;
flex: 0 0 auto;
padding: 9px 14px;
font-size: 11px;
white-space: nowrap;
}
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
* { animation: none !important; transition: none !important; }
}
/* ==========================================================================
* THE MOBILE / TABLET PASS
* ==========================================================================
*
* This file is the shell behind SEVEN pages -- pricing, menu-guide, contact,
* privacy, refund, terms and venues -- and it had four media rules to
* venues.css's thirteen. Measured before this block was written, at 390px and
* 820px with touch emulated:
*
* contact 21 of 21 controls under 44px
* privacy 16 of 17
* pricing 19 of 22, plus 15 over-long lines at tablet
* menu-guide 11 of 14, plus 40 over-long lines at tablet
*
* Almost every one of those failures is the same two rules: the header nav and
* the footer links, both 13px text with no padding, giving a 22px target. They
* are the most-tapped things on the public site and the least tappable.
*/
/* --- 1. TAP TARGETS ---
*
* 44px is the size of the end of a finger. inline-flex + min-height rather than
* vertical padding, so the box grows around the text without moving the
* baseline and re-spacing every header on the site.
*
* ⚠ `header.site nav a` DELIBERATELY EXCLUDES `a.brand`, which is a sibling of
*